Resit coursework
IMAT5262: Research,
Ethics, and Professionalism in Computing
1. Relevance
This re-submission
coursework is of relevance to students who deferred or failed the Research
Proposal component of the IMAT5262_1920_502 module and need to re-sit or re-submit
their Research Proposals ONLY. Students who failed individual components of the
original coursework but received an overall mark greater than or equal to 50%
do not need to re-submit the Research Proposal.
Marking of all
re-sit submissions are capped at 50%. Students who deferred the Research
Proposal Component of the May 2020 coursework are eligible for the full range
of marks, that is, their re-submissions are not subject to the cap of 50% as
applied to students who failed the coursework component in May 2020.
IMPORTANT: For students who are re-submitting due to a failed result in the
Research Proposal submitted in May 2020: Please do not be deterred from
submitting a high-quality Research Proposal, because of the 50% cap. You are
strongly advised to aim for the highest mark achievable in order to attain the
50% pass mark in this re-submission.
Please pay
special attention to your individual feedback on the failed component of the
coursework as well as the general feedback on Research Proposal submissions, to
be found in the Announcements folder.
The Research
proposal component comprises 60% of the Final module mark with the other two
components, namely, (1) the Weekly Readings and (2) the Group Presentation each
comprising 20% of the Final Module mark:
Final Mark =
0.6 (Research Proposal) + 0.2 (Weekly Readings) + 0.2 (Group Presentation)
2. Task Description
In order to cover the topics of the module,
this re-sit coursework will consist of an extended research proposal. The topic
of the proposal is to be suggested by the student. If you would like to consult
on the topic, please do not hesitate to contact me by email before 27 July 2020
at (mayen.cunden@dmu.ac.uk). The
topic must be within the broad area of the module, i.e. social and ethical
consequences of computing and information technology. Students may re-submit a Research
Proposal based on a different topic of the coursework to that originally
submitted in May 2020.
Students should
then do more detailed research on the topic, undertake a literature review that
shows the relevance of the topic and develop a suitable methodology that would enable
a suitable structured, scientific approach to follow in proposing to answer the
research question.
The structure of the proposal should include:
·
Title
·
Abstract
·
Table of Content
·
Background / introduction
·
Research question (should be
clear, focused, unambiguous, achievable)
·
Review of relevant literature,
which demonstrates that the research question covers a gap in the literature
·
Critical review of applicable
research methodologies, which discusses available methodologies with regards to
the research question, issues of data collection and analysis. Choice of
methodology should be clearly justified
·
Detailed project plan
·
Relevant references
·
Appendices
o (appendices should be used to provide the research instrument or
equivalent, e.g. a survey, case study protocol, interview plan, observation
plan etc.)
o Consideration of ethical issues should also be included in appendices
(use of the ethical review forms available in the Research Proposal Folder
The project
proposal should be approximately 3000 words long, excluding references and appendices. It should use the Harvard
style of referencing and it CANNOT use Internet references (this does not rule
out academic journal references which are accessible through the DMU resources
and library web site). The proposal must be submitted
in electronic form to the plagiarism detection system “Turnitin” built into
Blackboard.
You are
strongly advised to re-consider your re-sit submission if the Turnitin index
returns a score greater than 20%.
Required
Readings:
The module
readings can be used as a starting point to define the research question and
give an overview of methodology:
Oates,
Briony (2005): Researching Information
Systems and Computing. SAGE
Himma, Ken
& Tavani, Herman (eds.) (2008): Handbook
of Computer and Information Ethics. Wiley
Journals:
1.
Information, Communication,
Ethics and Society
(www.emeraldinsight.com/info/journals/jices/jices.jsp)
2.
ETHICOMP Journal (http://www.ccsr.cse.dmu.ac.uk/journal/)
3.
International Journal of
Technology and Human Interaction
(http://www.swetswise.com/eAccess/viewTitleIssues.do?titleID=324829)
3. Further detail
Submission deadline: 4th September 2020,
midday (12 noon)
Student support: The module leader will be available by email until
27 July 2020 and after 28th August 2020.
4.
The Research Proposal Re-Submission for IMAT5262:
Research, Ethics, and Professionalism in Computing
Student
Name………………………………….………………Title:…………..………………………………………………
|
|
0-29 |
30-39 |
40-49 |
50-59 |
60-69 |
70-80 |
80-90 |
90-100 |
|
Topic |
15% |
|
||||||||
|
Definition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevance |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Novelty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Content |
30% |
|
||||||||
|
conforming
to academic standards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
clarity
of argument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coherence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
abstract,
key words (5-10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structure |
20% |
|
||||||||
|
balance
/ logic of the argument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
knowledge
displayed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
quality
of resources |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
headings
(level, numbering) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion |
15% |
|
||||||||
|
fit
with argument |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
own
view |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
critical
reflection |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Formalities |
20% |
|
||||||||
|
References
(no Internet references) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Style |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Language |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(The percentages show the
approximate weighting, they are not intended for mathematical exactness)
Comments |
|
0 comments:
Post a Comment