Showing posts with label assessment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label assessment. Show all posts

Friday, 23 December 2022

Module Name: Fundamentals of Project Management 2020-21 SUM

UK assignment helper

 

                                 Assessment Brief  

Module Code

Level

Credit Value

Module Leader

BSOM071

7

20

Debbie Alexander


 

Assessment title:

 

 

PJ1 Presentation of Outline Business Case and PID documentation

Weighting:

60%

Submission dates:

Presentation 16th/ 23rd August

PID 30th August 2021

Feedback and Grades due:

 

30th September 2021

Please read this assessment brief in its entirety before starting work on the Assessment Task.

The Assessment Task

The assignment is to test all aspects of project work and to build up a “project toolbox” that can be deployed in the role of project manager or as part of a project team. There will be access to shared resources, industry and site experts. Software and plans will be made available. Prince2® principles and standards will be expected and the use of Prince2 proformas where possible, some adaption of these proformas can be accommodated.  All the proformas will be provided within the assignment folder on NILE. Agile techniques will be introduced and should be demonstrated.

Students (in self-selected groups of no more than 5) are to produce a Project Initiation Document (PID).  There is also a presentation element to this assessment . Students will assess whether all members of the group have performed equally and will be asked to sign a document relating to this with the completed work.

The Project: Construction of a Community Centre

The University of Northampton is the UK’s first Changemaker Campus and one of only 50 universities across the world globally recognised for its commitment to affecting positive social change by promoting social justice, sustainability, and supporting students who become the Changemakers of the Future.  We want to build a community centre on the campus, with the aim of serving and nurturing our local community.  Our mission is to promote, enable and facilitate a wide variety of inclusive activities in order to improve the lives of the people in our community.

Through the Changemaker Challenges we actively encourage staff and student expertise to make positive contribution to their community, and for this project, we want to ensure we include two of the four key areas:

1.     Contributing to making Northamptonshire the best county in the UK for children to flourish and learn

2.     Contribute to making Northamptonshire the leading county in the UK for Health and Wellbeing

We already have permission to build on campus, on the plot of land between the river and the sports facilities.  There is already a good road link to the land.

Once the facilities have been built, we want to encourage students, staff at the university and the wider community to volunteer and help run the community centre.  It will be run as a charity.

As a group, you have been asked to produce a Project Initiation Document, including a detailed Business case (to include the business options).  It is important to establish what the benefits are from both a financial and non-financial aspect.

High level Requirements and Constraints

1.     Currently we have funding from the National Lottery of £350,000 and are looking to obtain any additional finance from local investors. The land has already been purchased and is not included in this amount.

2.     Once all the planning has been completed, the work should be planned to start no later than August 2021 and completed by the end of August 2022.

3.     The project must include construction of an innovative multifunctional building to accommodate community activities.

4.     The typical facilities we want to offer are to include:

a.     Youth Clubs

b.     Drama classes for all ages

c.      Baby and toddler groups

d.     Health and wellbeing groups

e.     Senior Citizens

f.       Local musicians and artists

g.     Gardening enthusiasts to help with mental stress

h.     Talks,  workshops and courses

i.       Catering facilities

j.       Parking facilities

k.     At least half the plot should be dedicated to a community garden/allotment

l.       A parking area for at least 30 vehicles.

m.   A fence should be erected around the outdoor spaces to ensure young children are safe.

5.     The project should be driven by new technology, innovation and sustainability principles.

6.     The project, once completed, should be self-sustaining from a financial perspective, therefore consideration during the design needs to accommodate the need for income generation (hiring of spaces for parties and events to both individuals and businesses, restaurant/café, shop selling local crafts/food grown on the allotment etc.,).  Also, the facilities we will be offering will also bring in some income but the intension is that these should be free wherever possible.

It will be necessary to consult with the client to fully appreciate what their needs are for the project as only an outline has been provided.   Once you have identified additional requirements for the project, you are expected to produce a prioritised list (MoSCoW), and draw up the design plans.

All group work should be uploaded to your NILE group area in a timely manner. Include agendas and minutes of all group meetings held and include a RACI matrix for your team members and stakeholders.

Project Deliverables:

1.     Assign roles and responsibilities for the project team (RACI matrix).

2.     Prepare a PID (with Business Case including all aspects as shown below.  Ensure you include a detailed prioritised requirements list for the considered options.

3.     Log Risks in an Excel spreadsheet as located under Axelos Prince2® downloads - Risk register – and identify the Main Risks for the Business Case for the options (do nothing, do the minimal, do something).

4.     Develop a work breakdown structure (WBS) for the project. Break down the work to level 2 or level 3, as appropriate. Enter the WBS on your chosen software and be sure that it is based on the project brief provided here, the devised scope statement and other relevant information. Produce the project schedule  (the Gantt chart)  in MS Project/Excel or similar software.  Include the original MS Project /Excel file in your final submission.

5.     Identify at least fifteen milestones for this project. Produce a network diagram showing the critical path.

6.     Prepare a detailed cost estimate for the project, using any rigorous techniques with which you are familiar. You will conduct an investment appraisal using both ARR and Payback methods, determining which option is the best through ranking the appraisal results in a table.  You will then work out detailed costings for each option ensuring that you have factored in the use of Energy Saving methods and Sustainability.  There will be many assumptions you will have to make regarding income generation and projections, but provide as much detail as possible.

7.     Presentation of your project.  During the presentation, students are expected to use drawings and sketches to show the proposed layout and facilities. Students will be encouraged to use 2D or 3D software (try Sketchup as it is free) for their presentation to show their final layouts and designs.

The assignment is split into sections, to align with some of the PRINCE2 proformas.  The project is contrived to mimic as closely as possible a real project. Obviously, this involves some role play and a vivid imagination. Please ask if you need clarification as to my expectations for this assignment.

Word Limits

The maximum word limit for this assignment is 2000 words per student. This is a group assignment, therefore if there are four in a group the approximate word count should be 8000 words in total. 

Please ensure only one member of the group submits the final documentation.

Learning Outcomes

On successful completion of this assessment, you will be able to:

·        Compare, contrast and critically evaluate different theoretical approaches to project management in terms of frameworks, models and techniques and ascertain how they could align and be deployed to the needs of specific projects. 

·        Systematically select and implement a variety of analytical methods to assess the feasible financial options for a given project and critically evaluate the perceived commercial viability of specific scenarios.

·        Diagnostically select and utilise a range of strategies and technologies to cultivate and deploy best practice initiatives in the handling of risk, quality, resources and time issues within the project management processes.

·        Demonstrate the ability to communicate effectively and engage with groups, in oral, written form, exhibiting a masters level of academic rigour and the practical and analytic competencies needed for engaging with a project team.

Your grade will depend on the extent to which you meet these learning outcomes in the way relevant for this assessment. Please see the grading rubric on NILE for further details of the criteria against which you will be assessed. 

Assessment Support

Specific support sessions for this assessment will be provided by the module team and notified through NILE. You can also access individual support and guidance for your assessments from Library and Learning Services.  Visit the Skills Hub to access this support and to discover the online support also available for assessments and academic skills.

Academic Integrity and Misconduct

Unless this is a group assessment, the work you produce must be your own, with work taken from any other source properly referenced and attributed. For the avoidance of doubt this means that it is an infringement of academic integrity and, therefore, academic misconduct to ask someone else to carry out all or some of the work for you, whether paid or unpaid, or to use the work of another student whether current or previously submitted.

For further guidance on what constitutes plagiarism, contract cheating or collusion, or any other infringement of academic integrity, please read the University’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy.  Also useful resources to help with understanding academic integrity are available from UNPAC .

N.B. The penalties for academic misconduct are severe and can include failing the assessment, failing the module and expulsion from the university.

Assessment Submission

To submit your work, please go to the ‘Submit your work’ area on the NILE site and use the relevant submission point to upload your report. The deadline for this is 11.59pm (UK local time) on the date of submission. Please note that essays and text based reports should be submitted as word documents and not PDFs or Mac files.

Written work submitted to TURNITIN will be subject to anti-plagiarism detection software.  Turnitin checks student work for possible textual matches against internet available resources and its own proprietary database. Work

When you upload your work correctly to TURNITIN you will receive a receipt which is your record and proof of submission.  If your assessment is not submitted to TURNITIN, rather than a receipt, you will see a green banner at the top of the screen that denotes successful submission.

N.B Work emailed directly to your tutor will not be marked.

Late submission of work

For first sits, if an item of assessment is submitted late and an extension has not been granted, the following will apply:

·             Within one week of the original deadline – work will be marked and returned with full feedback, and awarded a maximum bare pass grade.

·             More than one week from original deadline – grade achievable LG (L indicating late).

For resits there are no allowances for work submitted late and it will be treated as a non-submission.

Please see the Assessment and Feedback Policy for full information on the processes related to assessment, grading and feedback, including anonymous grading.  You will also find the generic grading criteria for achievement at  University Grading Criteria.  Also explained there are the meanings of the various G grades at the bottom of the grading scale including LG mentioned above.

Extensions

The University of Northampton’s general policy with regard to extensions is to be supportive of students who have genuine difficulties, but not against pressures of work that could have reasonably been anticipated.

For full details please refer to the Extensions Policy.  Extensions are only available for first sits – they are not available for resits.

Mitigating Circumstances

For guidance on Mitigating circumstances please go to Mitigating Circumstances where you will find detailed guidance on the policy as well as guidance and the form for making an application.

Please note, however, that an application to defer an assessment on the grounds of mitigating circumstances should normally be made in advance of the submission deadline or examination date.

Feedback and Grades

These can be accessed through clicking on the Feedback and Grades tab on NILE. Feedback will be provided by a rubric with summary comments.

 

 

 

Wednesday, 3 November 2021

Best of Commemorate speech topics for free in 2021!

UK assignment helper

 Best of Commemorate speech topics for free in 2021!

 

What is a commemorative speech?

A commemorative talk is a lecture given in honor of an event or incident that has happened previously or is to honor an individual, a group of people within an organization. This form of talk is usually given during a big event or commemoration. The material should emphasize why it was, and still is, crucial to this individual, location, organization.

A commemorative speech differs from an informational speech in that it usually includes an understanding of the subject. The purpose of an upcoming presentation is to convey ideas in a structured and correct manner. A commemorative speech's goal is to convey emotion, elicit responses, and motivate. It is much more than a summary of a person's achievements.

 

How to write a commemorate speech

To be successful in some activities, you must understand the goals. Assume you're attending a wedding where the guests vaguely know the others. The only thing common is a deceased colleague. Your main goal is to bring those people together, to bring them closer together, and to instill in them a shared mentality. It is self-evident, but people routinely become disoriented while delivering a talk.

Following are some steps to think about:

1.      A memorial talk is about the realization of achievements, a topic must be chosen that coincides with the participant, group, organization, or circumstance.

 

2.     Come up with some ideas for details you may have in your speech within a week of writing a remembrance speech. Install a list of the components to include, rather than attempting to write an entire speech immediately.

 

3.     Choose a topic, write an overview of the major focuses you're trying to cover. Before detailing, please check if what you share is aimed at showing respect to the issue rather than simply releasing advice.

 

4.    Your article should have an interesting statement, like a bold generalization about your memorial speech's making an impact on the audience, organization, or event. Your objective is to raise awareness of the matter of the lecture to mark the occasional achievements

 

5.     Discuss other people who are compelled by the thing that you appreciate, as you can draw innovative concepts about their ambition. Contribute cites, such as statements that could be credited, if obtainable, to the theme of the speech.

 

 

Let’s discuss some commemorative speech topics

 

·        Pay tribute to those who perished on September 11, 2001.

 

·        Commemorate on the invention of the Atomic Bombs that blasted on Japan.

 

 

·        Commemorate the Second World War's end.

 

·        Celebrate the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

 

·        The importance of humility in today's egocentric world

 

·        Some instances of compromise that defined your life's progress

 

·        Despite his worries of blasphemy, Darwin pursued the truth.

 

·        Tell about a time when you and your team won a competition with the College's help.

·        Discuss the development of one of the most popular social networking platforms (Facebook)


 

A commemorative speech is a form of expression that motivates the crowd and brings them closer together. When delivering a talk, aim to bring people together by appealing to their similar goals. Make sure the text is cohesive and continuous and that it is relevant to the occasion.



Tuesday, 5 October 2021

Academic And Employability Skills

UK assignment helper

 



APPENDIX GA36a


LEVEL 4 ASSESSMENT SPECIFICATION

 

Programme:

CertHE Skills for the Workplace

Module:

Academic And Employability Skills

Module code:

BMSW4001

Contribution to Overall Module Assessment (%):

100%

Module Leader:

Sylvia Hoffmann

Internal Verifier:

Barbara Chinyani

Assignment Title:

ACE Practical Portfolio

Word count (or equivalent):

5-10 mins presentation and 2000 words report

Submission deadline:

To be announced by the Assessment team

Please refer to the assessments schedule published on Students’ Hall in Moodle

Return date of provisional marks & written feedback:

After the Exam Board

Submission method:

All written assessments, where practical and possible, must be submitted via Turnitin unless otherwise instructed by the Lecturer. (Please DO NOT put this assessment specification into Turnitin or it will match many similarities with other students’ submissions.)

Alternative submission method (if applicable):

Late submission of the assessment will result in a late penalty mark. Penalties for late submission: Up to one week late, maximum mark of 40%. Over one week late, 0%. Only the Extenuating Circumstances Panel may approve a change to submission dates.

Academic honesty / referencing:

Academic honesty is required. In the main body of your submission you must give credit to authors on whose research and ideas your work is based. Append to your submission a reference list that indicates the books, articles, etc. that you have used, cited or quoted in order to complete this assessment.


Module Learning Outcomes

(from module syllabus)

 

MODULE AIM

 

1.    To provide students with the underlying study/research strategies and software skills to facilitate effective study in Higher Education.

2.    To enable students to take responsibility for their own learning.

3.    To enable students to gain confidence and competence as effective employees by developing a range of employability skills such as reflection, time management and presentation skills.

 

LEARNING OUTCOMES

 

Upon the successful completion of this module, the student will be able to:

 

1.    Analyse published literature relating to a specific topic or subject area and produce a fully referenced, appropriately structured academic report.

 

2.    Reflect on their learning using recognised models of reflection.

 

3.    Research and present their findings in a variety of formats on a range of employability skills and collect and analyse feedback on their delivery.

 

ASSESSMENT

 

Assessment Component 1

 

Mode of assessment

Volume

Weighting

Practical portfolio of work (which may include: evidence generated during classroom activities / reflective reports / structured academic reports /

case study analysis / abstracts etc.)

 

4000 words or equivalent*

 

100%

*see task description for details of how this is broken up

 

PLEASE NOTE: Due to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the assessment brief for June 2021 term reflects the need for the entirety of the assessment to take place online.

 


 

Task 1: Individual presentation (5-10 minutes) - 50% of the final mark for the module

 

Based on your intended career, prepare a PowerPoint presentation of 5-10 slides which you will use to help you analyse your academic and employability skills, also referring to published literature.

 

Further guidelines :

 

·         Presentations will be held in week 9 online, using Microsoft Teams, so you are required to make sure that you have all the necessary equipment and technical setup to deliver your presentation on the scheduled date.

·         This will be a spoken presentation on camera, for 5-10 minutes.

·         The PowerPoint slides should be converted into a PDF/WORD document and uploaded to Turnitin/Moodle.

·         Make use of the tools you learned in class (e.g. SWOT analysis, time management tools, PDP) and apply them to your own situation.


·         Show an understanding of the world of work in the chosen sector by citing relevant articles or advice from recruitment agencies, job centres, etc.

 

Task 2: Report (2000 words) - 50% of the final mark for the module

 

Write an appropriately structured academic report where you reflect on your learning in this module, using a recognised model of reflection (one). Discuss 3-4 topics from those covered during the term (listed below) and reflect on how useful they have been to you, taking into consideration what you already knew and any learning you undertook outside of the classroom. You will need to explain the chosen model of reflection and apply it to each topic. You will also need to analyse published literature relating to the specific topics you discuss and use the feedback you received on all in-class activities.

 

Topics covered:

1.    Time management / Organising study

2.    Academic Writing

3.    Paraphrasing

4.    Summarising

5.    Referencing

6.    Reflection

7.    CV writing

8.    Cover letter writing

9.    Public speaking and giving presentations

10.  Online Learning Experience

 

Please note: at the end of the module, the marks from both tasks will be merged into one overall mark.

 

Text Box: GENERAL SUBMISSION GUIDANCE

1.	All of your submissions must include a title page that clearly states your name, your student number, the module code and title, your lecturer’s name, and your assignment title.
2.	All of your submissions should be typed in Arial font, size 11 (except PPT slides).
3.	All of your submissions should be typed with 1.5 line spacing (except PPT slides).
4.	All of your submissions should have an appropriate structure, include page numbers (except PPT slides) and have a reference list.


 

Text Box: GUIDANCE FOR STUDENTS IN THE COMPLETION OF TASKS


 

NOTE: The guidance offered below is linked to the five generic assessment criteria overleaf.

 

1.    Engagement with Literature Skills

Your work must be informed and supported by scholarly material that is relevant to and focused on the task(s) set. You should provide evidence that you have accessed an appropriate range of sources, which may be academic, governmental and industrial; these sources may include academic journal articles, textbooks, current news articles, organisational documents, and websites. You should consider the credibility of your sources; academic journals are normally highly credible sources while websites require careful consideration/selection and should be used sparingly. Any sources you use should be current and up-to-


date, mostly published within the last five years or so, though seminal/important works in the field may be older. You must provide evidence of your research/own reading throughout your work, using a suitable referencing system, including in-text citations in the main body of your work and a reference list at the end of your work.

 

Guidance specific to this assessment:

 

Your research for both tasks can be based on different online articles that discuss academic and employability skills from sources such as business magazines, recruiters’ websites, academic analyses, government reports, advice from job centres, etc. Please note: there is no requirement to use academic journals in this particular case. If in doubt about the suitability/relevance of the source, please consult your lecturer and/or the Academic Support tutor.

 

 

2.    Knowledge and Understanding Skills

At level 4, you should be able to demonstrate knowledge of the underlying concepts and principles associated with your area(s) of study. Knowledge relates to the facts, information and skills you have acquired through your learning. You demonstrate your understanding by interpreting the meaning of the facts and information (knowledge). This means that you need to select and include in your work the concepts, techniques, models, theories, etc. appropriate to the task(s) set. You should be able to explain the theories, concepts, etc. to show your understanding. Your mark/grade will also depend upon the extent to which you demonstrate your knowledge and understanding.

 

Guidance specific to this assessment:

 

For the presentation, you need to show that you understand what each skill discussed means and be able to give examples.

 

For the report, you need to show that you understand the chosen reflection model and the usefulness of the topics discussed, with detailed examples.

 

 

3.    Cognitive and Intellectual Skills

You should be able to present, evaluate and interpret qualitative and quantitative data, in order to develop lines of argument and make sound judgements in accordance with basic theories and concepts of your subject(s) of study. You should be able to evaluate the appropriateness of different approaches to solving problems related to your area(s) of study and/or work. Your work must contain evidence of logical, analytical thinking. For example, to examine and break information down into parts, make inferences, compile, compare and contrast information. This means not just describing what! But also justifying: Why? How? When? Who? Where? At what cost? You should provide justification for your arguments and judgements using evidence that you have reflected upon the ideas of others within the subject area and that you are able to make sound judgements and arguments using data and concepts. Where relevant, alternative solutions and recommendations may be proposed.

 

Guidance specific to this assessment:

For the presentation, explain why you think you possess the skills you discuss and draw appropriate conclusions, suggesting how you plan to improve those skills.

 

For the report, you need to demonstrate the ability to reflect on your learning experience (both in and outside of the classroom) by making logical connections between the material presented by the lecturer, your feelings about it, your thoughts during the class activities and your predictions as to how useful they will be for you in future.

 

4.    Practical Skills

At level 4, you should be able to apply the basic underlying concepts and principles to evaluate and interpret these within the context of your area of study. You should be able to demonstrate how the subject-related concepts and ideas relate to real world situations and/or a particular context. How do they work in practice? You will deploy models, methods, techniques, and/or theories, in that context, to assess current situations, perhaps to formulate plans or solutions to solve problems, or to create artefacts. This is likely to involve, for


instance, the use of real world artefacts, examples and cases, the application of a model within an organisation and/or benchmarking one theory or organisation against others based on stated criteria.

 

 

Guidance specific to this assessment:

 

For the presentation, you need to be able to evaluate your own skills in light of industry expectations. Make use of the different tools and techniques discussed in class or discovered through reading.

 

For the report, you need to be able to apply the reflection model to your learning experience, as well as any other relevant tools and techniques discussed in class or discovered through reading.

 

5.    Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice

Your work must provide evidence of the qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility. This includes demonstrating: that you can communicate the results of your study/work accurately and reliably, and with structured and coherent arguments; that you can initiate and complete tasks and procedures, whether individually and/or collaboratively; fluency of expression; clarity and effectiveness in presentation and organisation. Work should be coherent and well-structured in presentation and organisation.

 

 

Guidance specific to this assessment:

 

Your presentation should be well structured; it should have an introduction, a middle part and a conclusion. You should be able to communicate clearly and demonstrate a good level of public speaking/presentations skills. Your slides should have a consistent font and layout, mainly bullet points and be to the point.

 

Your report should be appropriately structured; it should have a cover page, a table of contents and logical sections. It should be written using formal language, in clear paragraphs, in a way that conveys the meaning intended. You should ensure the grammar, spelling, punctuation and use of vocabulary are correct and reflect the way you normally write in English. The use of translation and/or paraphrasing software is discouraged but you are welcome to use a dictionary/thesaurus.


Text Box: STUDENT FEEDBACK FORM

 

This section details the extent to which the assessment criteria are demonstrated by you, which in turn determines your mark. The marks available for each category of skill are shown. Lecturers will use the space provided to comment on the achievement of the task(s), including those areas in which you have performed well and areas that would benefit from development/improvement.

 

 

Generic Assessment Criteria

Marks available

 

Marks awarded

1. Engagement with Literature Skills

.

20

 

 

 

 

2. Knowledge and Understanding Skills

20

 

 

 

 

3. Cognitive and Intellectual Skills

20

 

 

 

 

4. Practical Application Skills

20

 

 

 

 

5. Transferable Skills for Life and Professional Practice

20

 

 

 

 

 

Assessment Mark (Assessment marks are subject to ratification at the Exam Board. These comments and marks are to give feedback on module work and are for guidance only until they are confirmed. )

Late Submission Penalties (tick if appropriate)

 

100%

Up to 1 week late (40% Max)

 

Over 1 week late (0%)

 


 

Text Box: GENERIC ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

 

 

Level 4

In accordance with the Framework for Higher Education Qualifications, at the end of Level 4 students will be expected to have demonstrated knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles of a subject, and an ability to evaluate and interpret these within the context of that area of study. They should be able to present, evaluate and interpret qualitative and quantitative data in order to develop lines of argument and make sound judgements in accordance with basic theories and concepts of their subject(s) of study. They will have learned how to evaluate different approaches to solving problems, and will be able to communicate the results of their study/work accurately and reliably, and with structured and coherent arguments. They will be able to undertake further training and develop new skills within a structured and managed environment and will have the qualities and transferable skills necessary for employment

requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility.

 

Level 4

FAIL

MARGINAL FAIL

SATISFACTORY

(3rd / Pass)

GOOD

(2.2 / Pass)

VERY GOOD

(2.1 / Merit)

EXCELLENT

(1st / Distinction)

EXCEPTIONAL

(1st / Distinction)

Category

0-29%

30-39%

40-49%

50-59%

60-69%

70-84%

85-100%

Engagement with literature (including reading, referencing,

academic conventions and

academic honesty)

Little or no evidence of reading and/or reliance on inappropriate sources.

Views and findings mostly unsupported and non- authoritative.

Referencing conventions used incoherently or largely absent.

Poor engagement with essential reading. No evidence of wider reading. Reliance on inappropriate sources, and/or indiscriminate use of sources. Heavily reliant on information gained through class contact. Inconsistent and weak use of referencing.

Engagement with a limited range of mostly relevant and credible sources but with some reliance on information gained through class contact.

Some omissions and minor errors.

Referencing conventions evident though not always applied accurately or

consistently.

Engagement with an appropriate range of literature, including sources retrieved independently. Some over- reliance on texts rather than other sources.

Referencing may show minor inaccuracies or inconsistencies.

Engagement with a wide range of literature, including sources retrieved independently. Selection of relevant and credible sources. Generally sound referencing, with no/very few inaccuracies or inconsistencies.

Engagement with an extensive range of relevant and credible literature.

Consistently accurate application of referencing.

Exceptional engagement with an extensive range of relevant and credible literature. High- level referencing skills consistently applied.

Knowledge and understanding (Knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and

Major gaps in knowledge and understanding of the basic underlying

concepts and

Gaps in knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles, with

flawed or

Limited knowledge and understanding of the basic underlying

concepts and

Knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles is

accurate with a

Competent knowledge of the basic underlying concepts and principles.

Exhibits very

Excellent knowledge and understanding of the basic underlying

concepts and

Exceptional, detailed knowledge and understanding of the basic

underlying


Level 4

FAIL

MARGINAL FAIL

SATISFACTORY

(3rd / Pass)

GOOD

(2.2 / Pass)

VERY GOOD

(2.1 / Merit)

EXCELLENT

(1st / Distinction)

EXCEPTIONAL

(1st / Distinction)

Category

0-29%

30-39%

40-49%

50-59%

60-69%

70-84%

85-100%

principles of a subject.)

principles of the subject matter. Inclusion of irrelevant material.

Substantial inaccuracies.

superficial understanding. Some significant inaccuracies and/or irrelevant material.

principles within the subject area. Some elements may be missing.

good understanding of the field of study but lacks depth and/or breadth.

good understanding.

principles of the subject.

concepts and principles

Cognitive and intellectual skills

(Evaluate underlying concepts and principles of a subject and interpret qualitative and quantitative data in order to develop lines of argument and make sound judgements.)

Wholly or almost wholly descriptive work. Little or no evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles.

Failure to develop arguments, leading to illogical or invalid judgements.

Minimal or no use of

evidence to back up views.

Largely descriptive work, with superficial evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Weak interpretation of data, flawed development of arguments and judgements.

Information accepted uncritically, uses generalised statements made with scant evidence and unsubstantiated opinions. Ideas sometimes illogical and

contradictory.

Limited attempt at evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles, tending towards description.

Can interpret qualitative and quantitative data but with some errors. Some evidence to support emerging arguments and judgements but these may be underdeveloped or with a little inconsistency / mis- interpretation.

Good evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Can interpret qualitative and quantitative data, with minor errors.

An emerging ability to use evidence to support the argument.

Mostly valid arguments and logical judgements.

Sound evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Can interpret qualitative and quantitative data accurately.

Ability to devise arguments using evidence to make mostly appropriate and valid judgements.

Excellent evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles. Can interpret qualitative and quantitative data accurately and with some insight. Excellent ability to devise arguments using evidence and make appropriate and valid judgements.

Exceptional evaluation of the underlying concepts and principles based evidence.

Outstanding interpretation of qualitative and quantitative data.

Exceptional ability to devise arguments using evidence and make wholly appropriate and valid judgements.

Practical skills (Different approaches to

solving problems

in particular contexts.)

Limited or no use of taught, basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques.

Little or no appreciation of the context of

the application.

Rudimentary application of taught, basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques but without consideration

and

An adequate awareness and mostly appropriate application of basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques.

A good and appropriate application of basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques.

Clear appreciation of

A very good application of a range of basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques.

Very good consideration of the context of

An advanced application of a range of taught, basic methods, materials, tools and/or techniques.

The context of the application is

Exceptional levels of application and deployment skills in particular practical contexts.

Outstanding identification of


Level 4

FAIL

MARGINAL FAIL

SATISFACTORY

(3rd / Pass)

GOOD

(2.2 / Pass)

VERY GOOD

(2.1 / Merit)

EXCELLENT

(1st / Distinction)

EXCEPTIONAL

(1st / Distinction)

Category

0-29%

30-39%

40-49%

50-59%

60-69%

70-84%

85-100%

 

Very weak evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts.

competence. Flawed appreciation of the context of the application. Weak evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts.

Basic appreciation of the context of the application. Can identify problems in particular contexts and propose basic alternative approaches or solutions though there may be

errors.

the context of the application. Good evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts and proposes mostly appropriate solutions.

the application. Very good evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts and proposes appropriate solutions.

well considered, and insightful.

Excellent evidence of different approaches to problem-solving in particular contexts and proposes appropriate solutions.

problems in particular contexts and formulation of wholly appropriate, thoughtful solutions / different approaches.

Transferable skills for life and professional practice

(Communicate the results of their study/work accurately and reliably, and with structured and coherent arguments; the qualities needed for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility within a structured and managed environment.)

Work is poorly structured, disorganised, inaccurate and/or confusingly expressed. Very weak use of language and/or very inappropriate style. Failure to work effectively individual or as part of a group. Little or no evidence of the skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility.

Work is poorly presented in a disjointed manner. It is loosely, and at times incoherently, structured, with information and ideas often poorly expressed.

Weak use of language and/or inappropriate style. Flawed approach to individual or group work, meeting only partial obligations to others. Limited evidence of the skills for

employment requiring the

Mostly ordered presentation and structure in which relevant ideas / concepts are reasonably expressed. Work may lack coherence and/or accuracy in places. Can work as part of a group, meeting most obligations to others but perhaps with limited involvement in group activities. Demonstrates the basic skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility,

with some areas

Mostly coherent, organised and accurate work, in a suitable structure and is for the most part clearly expressed. Can work effectively independently and/or as part of a team, with clear contribution to group activities. Demonstrates the skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility, with some areas of strength and some of minor weakness.

Work is accurate, coherent, fluent, well-structured and organised. Can work effectively independently and/or as part of a team, with very good contribution to group activities. Demonstrates very good skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility, with just occasional minor weakness.

Work is coherent, very fluent and is presented professionally. Can work effectively independently and/or as part of a team, with an excellent contribution to group activities. Demonstrates excellent skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility with an appetite for further development.

Work is accurate, exceptionally coherent, very fluent and presented well. Can work effectively independently and/or as part of a team, with an exceptional contribution to group activities. Demonstrates exceptional skills for employment requiring the exercise of some personal responsibility with an appetite for further development.


Level 4

FAIL

MARGINAL FAIL

SATISFACTORY

(3rd / Pass)

GOOD

(2.2 / Pass)

VERY GOOD

(2.1 / Merit)

EXCELLENT

(1st / Distinction)

EXCEPTIONAL

(1st / Distinction)

Category

0-29%

30-39%

40-49%

50-59%

60-69%

70-84%

85-100%

 

 

exercise of some personal

responsibility.

of minor weakness.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THIS DOCUMENT IS ALSO AVAILABLE IN WELSH