Assignment task
This is a 3000-words essay based
assignment.
The assignment
requires you to:
•
To give your assignment a title
and to weave elements of the case study into the essay (Please remember
that it’s not a
reflective essay).
•
You are expected to provide
general information about leadership and management to include nursing, in
addition identify relevant leadership and management theories and/or models.
But, most importantly discuss the styles that are applicable to your case study
and why / why not they were/are appropriate in the context. You are required to
support your discussions with current policies, literature, and practice
experience which is related to your formative case study.
•
You are required to identify
collaboration, MDT and inter-professional working; and discuss the impact of
these to your formative case study and to patient-centred care.
•
Discuss relational leadership
and its effectiveness to create positive and/or negative relationships- e.g.
inclusiveness, empowerment and how this links to theory, patient-centred care
and your case study.
•
You are required to demonstrate
self-awareness- within the essay. Apply your discussions to ‘self’- as a
qualified nurse, what do your findings/conclusions mean for your future practice.
following module learning outcomes:
LO1 Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the leadership and management skills required to engage and reflect on the ever-changing delivery of health and social care.
LO2 Critically discuss the benefits and challenges of inter-professional collaborative practice.
LO3 Critically evaluate the role of self in relational leadership and problem solving when engaging with multiprofessional teams, service users, carers, families and significant others.
LO4 Critically appraise the contribution of different approaches that inform inter-professional and multi-agency working.
Task requirements
•
This assignment should be
presented in essay format, with a clear introduction and conclusion.
•
You should avoid use of the 1st
and 2nd person and use an appropriately formal academic style, avoiding
contractions (e.g., don’t, won’t, etc.) and informal or spoken forms of
language. Essays do not typically use headings and sub-headings.
•
Be sure not to identify any
individual or organisation directly or by implication in your work (NMC, 2015).
Equally, unless crucial to the argument and/or where the information is already
in the public domain, refer to organisations only in the most general terms,
e.g., an NHS trust.
•
Your essay should include
your attached case study as an appendix; this will help you to direct the learning
outcomes and to demonstrate the impact of literature within your assignment.
•
The identified practice-based
activity should have occurred while you were practicing within a
multidisciplinary/intra-professional setting.
•
You must demonstrate all the learning
outcomes within the assignment, outlining the theories and models,
using literature, policies and research as appropriate.
•
Use literature, research and current policies
to demonstrate your critical ability
and why the theory supports your academic findings either
positively or negatively.
•
Use selected areas of your case
study to identify and demonstrate effective/ineffective practice knowledge
within the assignment.
•
Within the
summative assignment you should briefly outline of the case study to help you
focus.
Remember this
is not a reflective assignment
•
You are required to
provide a cover sheet;
•
Module code and Module title
•
Module Leader
•
Seminar Leader
•
Font Size 12 and Ariel,
1.5-line space
•
Word Count declared
Referencing and research
requirements
Please reference your work according to the Harvard style as defined
in Cite Them Right Online
(http://www.citethemrightonline.com). This information is
also available in book form: Pears, R. and Shields, G. (2016) Cite them right: the essential reference
guide. 10th edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Copies are
available via the University library.
How your work will be
assessed
Your work will be assessed on the extent to which it demonstrates
your achievement of the stated learning
outcomes for
this assignment (see above) and against other key criteria, as defined in the
University’s institutional grading descriptors. If it is appropriate to the
format of your assignment and your subject area, a proportion of your marks
will also depend upon your use of academic referencing conventions.
This assignment will be
marked according to the grading descriptors for Level 6.
Submission details
Elctronic Submission
• This
assignment should be submitted electronically. Please use the relevant Turnitin
submission point in the Submit your work
area in your Blackboard module shell.
• Please ensure
that your work has been saved in an appropriate file format. Turnitin will only
accept the following file types: Microsoft Word, Excel or PowerPoint,
PostScript, PDF, HTML, RTF, OpenOffice (ODT), Hangul (HWP), Google Docs, or
plain text. Your file must also contain at least 20 words of text, consist of
fewer than 400 pages and be less than
40MB in size.
• You
can submit your work as many times as you like before the submission date. If
you do submit your work more than
once, your earlier submission will be replaced by the most recent version.
• Once
you have submitted your work, you will receive a digital receipt as proof of
submission, which will be sent to your forwarded e-mail address (provided you
have set this up). Please keep this receipt for future reference, along with
the original electronic copy of your assignment.
• You are reminded of the University’s regulations on academic
misconduct, which can be viewed on the University website: https://bucks.ac.uk/ data/assets/pdf_file/0024/9546/Academic-Misconduct- Policy.pdf. In submitting your assignment, you are acknowledging
that you have read and understood these regulations
• Please also note that work that is submitted up to 10 working days
beyond the submission date will be considered a late submission. Late
submissions will be marked and the actual mark recorded but will be capped at
the pass mark (typically 40%), provided that the work is of a passing standard.
Work submitted after this period will not be marked and will be treated as a non-submission.
0 comments:
Post a Comment