Systems Analysis for Business (U30209) 2021 session
Coursework assignment (100%
weighting)
Word count: 2500 words, +/- 10%
Moodle (Turnitin) submission
File name format: <Student number>-
SAB-coursework
Submission date: 5pm, Friday 28th May
Associated
learning outcomes
Investigate,
analyze and review methodologies relating to Information Systems Analysis and
Design.
Compare,
contrast, evaluate, and select appropriate approaches for developing Information
Systems.
Develop
a strategic understanding of systems analysis in modern organizations.
Specification
Critically discuss what you have learned from this module which will be useful to help frame your approach to an MSc project
topic, and why.
This
coursework is about applying the systems thinking you have learned on this
module to a particular subject area.
Think about a subject area that either (a) you are doing an MSc project
in or (b) that you could do a project in.
Task 1: Give the title of your idea.
Explain the scope and purpose of your idea.
Task 2: From each of the four topics
presented on Moodle:
●
Stakeholders
and perspectives
●
Knowledge
management
●
Systems
thinking
●
Information
systems
Identify one source (article) from each of the four topics within the Moodle
resources provided which is particularly interesting to you, and applicable
to your MSc project topic.
Cite
example statements from these sources (author,
year, page number).
Explain
what is interesting and/or useful about each statement, from the point of view
of your project topic. You should also indicate why the statement is/would be interesting and relevant for your
project topic.
Note that you should comment on how the different
topics we have covered in the module will help you develop a strategic
understanding of your MSc project topic. This work
may eventually be included as an appendix for your MSc project and should be
shared with your project supervisor.
There will be the opportunity for formative feedback
on your drafts, and examples of project topics and good work will be put onto
Moodle.
Plagiarism
and referencing
It is your responsibility to
understand the concept of plagiarism and poor scholarship. You are required to read and think for
yourself, and to avoid a copy-paste approach.
Please accurately reference your work using the APA format.
See http://www.referencing.port.ac.uk/apa/index.html for details.
It is recommended that you use a bibliographic software tool to support your work, such as EndNote, Zotero,
Mendeley.
Grammar
and spelling
Correct UK English grammar and
spelling are expected in critical essay writing. You will be marked down on
Structure and Presentation if your grammar and spelling are deficient. You may
be marked down in other sections if poor language usage makes your meaning or
argument difficult to follow.
Anonymity
All coursework must be anonymous.
You must not put your name on your
work. Work should only be identified by your student ID number in the document
(see above instructions about file name format).
Marking
and feedback
Marks and feedback will be given to
students within twenty working days of the submission date.
Marking
criteria (based on University grade criteria)
Mark range % |
Criteria |
80-89 |
As below plus: ●
Excellent workable to express an original reasoned argument lucidly by reviewing and critiquing a wide range of material. Original, critical thinking based on
outstanding insight, knowledge, and understanding of the material. ●
Wide-reaching research showing breadth and depth of sources. |
70-79 |
|
60-69 |
As below plus: ●
Clear, balanced, coherent, critical, and rigorous analysis of the subject matter. Detailed understanding of knowledge and theory expressed with clarity. ●
Extensive use of relevant and current literature to view the topic in perspective, analyze content and develop new explanations and ideas. |
50-59 |
As below plus: ●
Detailed review and grasp of pertinent issues and a critical contextual overview of the literature. Thorough knowledge of theory and methods and uses this to underpin arguments and conclusions. ●
Confidence in understanding and using literature. |
40-49 |
●
Demonstrates grasp of key concepts and an ability to develop and
support an argument in a predominantly descriptive way with valid conclusions
drawn from the research. ●
Familiarity with key literature which is cited and presented according
to convention. ●
Logical and clear structure, well organized with good use of language
and supporting material. |
30-39 |
FAIL – Some knowledge of
relevant concepts and literature but significant gaps in understanding and /
or knowledge. Little attempt at evaluation, conclusions vague, ambiguous, and not based on researched material. Limited or inappropriate research. Deficits in length, structure, presentation, and/or prose. |
20-29 |